Clinical outcomes of double- vs single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review of randomized control trials
J. Kongtharvonskul, J. Attia, S. Thamakaison, C. Kijkunasathian, P. Woratanarat, A. Thakkinstian
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2012 Jan 31
Without question, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are one of the most common knee injuries sustained by athletes at all levels. ACL reconstruction is the standard of care to treat patients with complete ruptures. However, currently there are two surgical techniques to commonly used reconstruct the ACL (single and double bundle). Previous meta-analyses have compared single vs. double bundle ACL reconstructions examining both anterior-posterior translation and rotational stability as measured by the KT1000/2000, but other factors such as functional outcomes and heterogeneity sources (i.e., age, gender, sex, injury grade, use of instrument assessment) have gone largely unexamined. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review was to determine which ACL reconstruction technique (single vs. double bundles) improves both anterior-posterior and rotational stability as well as functional outcomes, while controlling for several factors.